I’m sure
I’m not the first person to notice that each Bond actor (with the exception of
George Lazenby) corresponds, very roughly, to a decade. So Connery is the 60’s Bond, Moore
the 70’s, Dalton
the 80’s, Brosnan the 90’s and Craig the 00’s.
One of the (many) problems with Moore’s extended tenure in the role is
that he forced the series to dick around in jokey, escapist territory well
after the Cold War had heated up again in the Reagan/Thatcher/Gorbachev 80’s. There were some stabs at Cold War era
politics in the last few movies, but The Living Daylights is the first time
we’re dipping deeply back into the well of the Cold War in a long time. Timothy Dalton provides the series with a
lead that allows it to do this massive course correction, certainly the most
overt recasting of the role up to this point, with all of Moore ’s winky self-satisfaction being
eliminated from the character by someone who specializes in the brutality
portion of the role. The plot involves a
KGB officer who is supposedly defecting to the West, but naturally things get
much more complicated.
So let me
get down to brass tacks – I consider The Living Daylights to be almost entirely
a disappointment, a massive missed opportunity that does not remotely have the
courage of its convictions. With Moore
stepping down, and with the political situation of the world in the mid-to-late
80’s, the producers had a golden opportunity to do more than just tweak the
series towards less frothy fare, but to in fact overhaul it completely,
rebuilding it from the ground up as a lean, mean action franchise. If there is one thing that can be said about
the 80’s it was the golden age of pure action cinema, thoughtless brutes going
into the jungles of Southeast Asia and extracting justice through pure force of
will. And here comes James Bond, the
ultimate Cold War hero, finally unleashed as a young, hungry spy again, and all
the film can manage is a bloated, dishwater dull adventure yarn that’s like a
crappy Indiana Jones knockoff directed by some Carolco hack.
I don’t
mean to be quite that harsh – this is an okay movie. It’s certainly not at the levels of awfulness
as the worst of the Moore
era. But there’s a reason people don’t
still watch it except when they do dumb Bond marathons like this one, because
it’s just not that interesting. I’ll
turn on Top Gun and watch it until the end, despite it being 100 times dumber
than this movie, because it is filmed and edited with a visual flair, and it is
filled with justifiably famous scenes. Now
that’s an unfair standard, since Top Gun is a stone-cold classic (don’t snicker
– you know, in your heart, that this is true).
But The Living Daylights isn’t even as interesting as a 2nd
rate Schwarzenegger vehicle like Commando.
It’s just there. It exists. You have to watch it to complete your 007
collection.
The
aforementioned KGB officer, General Koskov, is of course pulling a massive
scheme off, where he’s not actually defecting but has some sort of plan to buy
heroin from the mujaheddin for a rock-bottom price, sell it in the West, and
then use the profits both to arm the Soviets and make himself rich. If you squint you can vaguely see the Iron
Contra scandal in there somewhere, but mostly it’s a complicated scheme for the
sake of both dragging the plot out to a *very* long 2 hours and 10 minutes and
also to remind us that the Soviets are currently bogged down in a war in
Afghanistan.
I am
pretty certain that I am in the distinct minority as someone who actually likes
a-ha’s theme song. It has a pretty
terrible reputation and I’m semi-puzzled by that fact.
There is
one very unfortunate “joke” delivered by Q about a “ghetto blaster”, which is a
boom box that shoots rockets because get it?
Maryam
D’Abo as General Koskov’s girlfriend (who eventually turns on him, of course,
because she has to sleep with Bond) Kara Milovy is okay. Not that memorable, but certainly never
actively terrible or irritating. She
plays the cello and she’s reasonably helpful, or at least as helpful as a woman
is allowed to be when Bond is around.
She’s basically the only female character of any note in the movie, so
Bond doesn’t get to be seduced by a woman working for the villain (a hallmark
of the Moore era, and poor Dalton is just immediately told, you are not
even up to the level of charm exhibited by decrepit-assed, 57 year old Roger
Moore.) She has a dumb hairdo but what are
you gonna do, she’s from behind the Iron Curtain.
There are
a couple of action set pieces which aren’t really worth discussing in detail
except inasmuch that Dalton’s presence allows for real action to return to the
series after its long hiatus of long shots/bad blue screen, to something that
vaguely suggests that Bond is once again actually taking part in action
scenes. The opening action scene is
pretty good, significantly better than basically anything in the Moore era, so at least
there’s that.
Felix
Leiter returns for the first time since Live and Let Die, and I’m not really
sure why he disappeared for almost all of Roger Moore’s run. He’s played here by John Terry and I couldn’t
remember who Terry was until Wikipedia reminded me that he played Christian
Shepherd.
I haven’t
mentioned General Gogol at any point, but he was a recurring character in most
of the Moore
films as the head of the KGB. He gets
replaced in this film by John Rhys-Davies, and although the film suggests that
he will be a recurring character going forward, I know that this will be his
first and last appearance.
We have a
new Moneypenny, so now Q is the only member of the Big Four at MI-6 (Bond, M, Q
and Moneypenny) that hasn’t been recast.
Presumably they decided that Lois Maxwell was now too old to credibly
flirt with Bond, since Dalton
is something like 20 years her junior.
This was the right decision, but the new actress (Caroline Bliss) is
something pretty close to awful. She’s
dolled up as the 80’s-est of all 80’s on-screen women, with big ugly glasses
and pulled up blonde hair that’s kind of a mess. She basically looks like Angela from Who’s
the Boss, and it is just a terrible look for Moneypenny, but the worst part is
that she possesses not one single ounce of chemistry with Dalton .
Dalton
has chemistry problems with D’Abo too, but not nearly as severe.
This movie
is a little (although not egregiously so) racist; besides the ghetto blaster
joke, the way the Afganis are presented is mostly stereotype, and that could
have been forgiven 20 or even 10 years before, but in 1987 I’m just going to
have to give some demerits to a film that fits comfortably in the Rambo Part
III spectrum of “this is what Afghanis are like.” There’s a scene at the very end where Bond’s
Afghan allies have traveled to London to meet
him and they are wearing bandoliers filled with ammunition, which they
apparently wore all the way from Afghanistan , including on their
commercial flight. It’s a little thing,
but it is stupid, and this is a movie that thinks it has left behind the most
egregiously stupid bits of the Moore
era, so it needs to be held to account.
Bond only
clearly beds the one woman, I think, D’Abo’s Bond Girl, but the film implies
that he beds a random woman right at the end of the opening scene’s action set
piece, before the credits sequence kicks in.
No comments:
Post a Comment